¿Gestión pública, privada o por el tercer sector? Diferencias en los resultados en atención primaria de Cataluña / Public, private or third sector management? Differences in the results in Primary Care in Catalonia

Objetivo: Comparar los resultados de los equipos de atención primaria en Cataluña en función de su modelo de gestión y evaluar el impacto de un modelo de gestión conocido como gestión por entidades de base asociativa (EBA). Diseño: Llevamos a cabo un análisis comparado multidimensional siguiendo una lógica cuasi-experimental a partir de comparar los centros gestionados a través del modelo EBA con otros centros gestionados por el sector público a través del Instituto Catalán de la Salud (ICS) o por el tercer sector a través de consorcios hospitalarios. Localización: Barcelona, Cataluña, España. Participantes: Tenemos en cuenta 368 observaciones (centros de atención primaria) y 18 parámetros medidos en 2015. Intervenciones: Distintos métodos de gestión. Mediciones principales: Comparación de indicadores de actividad, efectividad en el proceso asistencial y eficiencia antes y después de controlar por el indicador socioeconómico del área básica de salud y las características de la región sanitaria. Test de diferencias significativas en las medias de los indicadores según modelo de gestión una vez realizado el emparejamiento conforme a variables clave mediante la técnica Propensity Score Matching. Resultados: Diferencias significativas en el indicador de carga de trabajo por profesional médico de familia, en cinco indicadores de efectividad en el proceso asistencial y en el coste por usuario. Conclusiones: La diversificación del modelo de gestión a través del modelo EBA muestra resultados que se pueden interpretar a favor del mantenimiento o de la ampliación de la aplicación de este modelo de gestión. Si bien los centros gestionados a través del modelo EBA se han implantado en áreas de nivel socioeconómico medio o alto, sus resultados continúan siendo significativamente positivos una vez se controla por el nivel socioeconómico de su área

Goal: Compare the performance of primary health centers managed by the public sector (ICS), the third sector (Hospitals) or by small private organizations known as EBAs. Design: Multidimensional comparative analysis. We follow a quasi-experimental logic comparing primary health centers managed by EBAs with other centers managed by the public sector (ICS) o by the third sector (hospitals). Localization: Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Participants: We have 368 observations (primary health centers) and 18 indicators measured in 2015. Intervention: Different management models (public, third sector, private). Main measures: We compare activity measures, measures of effectiveness in the process of medical assistance, and efficiency. We compare before and after controlling for the socio-economic level corresponding to the basic health area and the characteristics of the population and health region. We conduct a test of significant differences between the indicators corresponding to centers managed differently, after a process of matching using key variables and Propensity Score Matching. Results: Significant differences in the measure of work load for family doctors, in five measures of effectiveness in the process of assistance and in the cost per user. Conclusions: The diversity in the management model through EBAs shows results that can be interpreted in favor of the maintenance or the expansion of this model of management. The majority of EBAs have been implanted in areas of a medium or high level, but their results are still significantly positive once the socio economic level of the area is controlled

[Public, private or third sector management? Differences in the results in Primary Care in Catalonia]. / ¿Gestión pública, privada o por el tercer sector? Diferencias en los resultados en atención primaria de Cataluña.

GOAL: Compare the performance of primary health centers managed by the public sector (ICS), the third sector (Hospitals) or by small private organizations known as EBAs. DESIGN: Multidimensional comparative analysis. We follow a quasi-experimental logic comparing primary health centers managed by EBAs with other centers managed by the public sector (ICS) o by the third sector (hospitals). LOCALIZATION: Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: We have 368 observations (primary health centers) and 18 indicators measured in 2015. INTERVENTION: Different management models (public, third sector, private). MAIN MEASURES: We compare activity measures, measures of effectiveness in the process of medical assistance, and efficiency. We compare before and after controlling for the socio-economic level corresponding to the basic health area and the characteristics of the population and health region. We conduct a test of significant differences between the indicators corresponding to centers managed differently, after a process of matching using key variables and Propensity Score Matching. RESULTS: Significant differences in the measure of work load for family doctors, in five measures of effectiveness in the process of assistance and in the cost per user. CONCLUSIONS: The diversity in the management model through EBAs shows results that can be interpreted in favor of the maintenance or the expansion of this model of management. The majority of EBAs have been implanted in areas of a medium or high level, but their results are still significantly positive once the socio economic level of the area is controlled.